Skip to main content


The foomo team has extensive experience with a wide range of CMS systems. Our long journey in the field has brought us very close to the . We almost exclusively work with but we are watching others like and very closely.

Expectations and challenges

  • application developers want an environment, that ensures maximum productivity, they do not think of semantic structures, they think of routes
  • customers expect maximum control and flexibility when working with content and do not distinguish between content and applications

The need for dynamic rendering

If you can - render static content and distribute it with a CDN.

There are use cases though, where static site generation does not work like

  • highly personalized content
  • mixing content with entities from other systems, that have a different life cycle, like products

Application routes vs semantic URL structures

Bridging the conceptual gap between sematic content and applications.

Content especially when created with a focus on SEO comes as a semantic graph. This typically conflicts with how application developers see the world.

e-commerce as an example

Let us take a look at a real world example:

application route / ingressapp developers viewSEO URL requirement

our approach

contentserver allows you to resolve URIs to mime types, which can be handled by applications.

Let us return to our ecommerce example.

model content

mime typecms entityapplication eg k8s service

export contentent to contentserver

contentserver allows you to export your content tree as json

resolving URIs

Use standard application routing whereever possible, since it is the most efficient option.

Once all standard URI resolution fails, query contentserver and it will return the resolved node

Now you have the mime-type and you know which application can handle it.